A parliamentary democracy versus populism argument is often presented as a contest between an out-of-touch establishment and the authentic voice of the people. That account is appealing because it is simple. It is also incomplete. Parliamentary government was designed not to suppress public feeling, but to turn it into decisions that can be tested, amended, funded and lived with.
The difficulty begins when patience with that process is mistaken for contempt. People who feel ignored by Westminster, left behind economically, or patronised by professional politics have sound reasons to be dissatisfied. Yet dissatisfaction does not make every proposed remedy wise. The central question is whether Britain can make representative government more accountable without exchanging it for politics conducted through anger, slogans and permanent division.